[TML] White Dwarfs, Black Holes & 100 Diameters
shadow at shadowgard.com
shadow at shadowgard.com
Mon Nov 5 15:13:18 MST 2007
On 5 Nov 2007 at 9:37, Anthony Jackson wrote:
> Jeff Zeitlin wrote:
>
> > Ummm... No. This is specifically giving up relativity; the whole point
> > of relativity was that there IS no preferred frame of reference. You're
> > trying to establish one here.
>
> Um. Not totally. There is nothing preventing you from measuring the
> average speed of a system and declaring that to be a speed of 0. It
> won't have any special effects within relativity, but it's reasonably
> well defined.
Yes, but the idea of all jumps being figured with respect to that
reference frame *does* constitute a preferred frame of reference.
Which violates relativity.
--
Leonard Erickson (aka shadow)
shadow at shadowgard dot com
More information about the TML
mailing list