[TML] Prototype
Jerry W Barrington
jursamaj at yahoo.com
Wed Nov 7 20:48:17 MST 2007
On 11/7/07 1:44 AM, James Ramsay wrote:
> Your argument is flawed. Firstly, constant change and adaption are not
> required for an "organism" to be successful, there are plenty of
> organisms that have been in their niche for a long time. Also evolution
> stops working "naturally" once sapience is involved, as organisms can
> cheat (Homo Sapiens Sapiens cheated so hard we don't have any cousins).
> The Vilani gained the benefit of early momentum, and then changed enough
> to maintain their lead. Until the freakish Terrans came along with a
> much faster rate of advance then was normal for any other culture.
>
> The Vilani were technologically conservative because they could get away
> with it.
The only organisms that haven't changed were those whose environments were
stable. When the environment changes, the organism must keep up or go
extinct. In a vast Imperium, environmental stability is horrifically
improbable. The environment includes all those other, surrounding empires.
As for sapience, Homo Sapiens Sapiens stability hasn't been tested yet:
sapience has been applied for a very short time. :) In a few
years/centuries/whatever, we may do a lot more change to ourselves.
Even so, the change has shifted from the biological unit to cultural units,
and change continues.
You even said it yourself: "Vilani ... changed enough to maintain their
lead". And the Vargr, Aslan, Zho, etc. (even their own sub-cultures), would
keep pushing, leading to more change. I don't believe they *could* "get
away with it."
More information about the TML
mailing list