[TML] Bigass Planet X
Jerry W Barrington
jursamaj at yahoo.com
Tue Nov 20 06:49:55 MST 2007
On 11/19/07 7:55 PM, Steve Burchett wrote:
> I remember being taught Bode's Law in my youth. I wonder if it is still
> valid?
It not a "Law", as such. Systems do seem to have roughly that sort of
structure, but with different relations between the orbits and lots of
exceptions. Mostly it's a result of orbital resonance, and planets
"clearing" their neighborhoods.
And by systems, I include the system of planets, and the moon systems of
some planets.
As Eris pointed out, the "standard" Traveller orbits use the Bode Law,
extended outward. Plus the possibility of a few loose "intermediate"
orbits, which explains Neptune's "wrong" position. But it's on an eccentric
orbit which crosses Pluto's.
I once devised a system that started from a random orbit in the habitable
zone and randomly went inward and outward. I multiplied or divided by a
number that was constant (but randomly generated) for each system. And
there was a chance of empty orbits. I'd dig it out, but I'm now inclined to
use something like StarGen. It starts with a star and generates the
planets' orbits, size, temperature, atmosphere, etc. And if you write down
the seed number, you can always regenerate it from the program. :)
On 11/19/07 7:55 PM, Timothy Little wrote:
> What does this do to the distribution of objects that *do* qualify as
> being planets rather than large belt objects? I don't think we can
> know, yet. We only have a census of planets in one system, and no
> idea whether the conditions here were typical.
That's why we need to look not at our own system, but at the products of
reasonable simulations.
We know gas/dust clouds exist, we can observe them.
We know from physics how such a cloud should collapse into roughly a disk.
Then it is a matter of making different assumptions about how such a disk
accretes into larger objects. All the simulations I have seen make systems
*roughly* like the aforementioned StarGen, leading to the thought that real
systems should look *roughly* like that. Incidentally, the overall shape is
similar to our Solar System, but with great variation: small rocky bodies
close to the star, progressing to gas giants, then to smaller rocky/icy
bodies. This is due to mass distribution and to stellar radiation.
More information about the TML
mailing list