[TML] Current USAF fleet was Re: CT Sup 7, Crews room sizes.
Richard Aiken
raikenclw at gmail.com
Wed Apr 23 23:03:12 MDT 2008
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Jerry W Barrington
<jerry.barrington at gmail.com> wrote:
> I assume, like I said, that he wants to justify the shiny new toy. :)
Yep. Remember the long thread a while back about UAV's as front line
fighters? Riiiight.
I stand by what I said then. Fighter planes need fighter pilots for
reasons of human psychology, not tactics or technology. Now, I *can*
easily see the USAF letting the A-10 get replaced by a UAV of similar
capacity. But I'll believe a fully-robotic air-superiority fighter
when I see it and not before. The "real" fighter will be the last
bastion of the human pilot. This makes absolutely zero sense - the G
force issue alone means a suitably-programmed robot makes a better
fighter pilot that even the most fit human - but every other warplane
will get a robot pilot before the fighter finally does.
--
Richard Aiken
"Never insult anyone by accident." Robert A. Heinlein
More information about the TML
mailing list