[TML] Noncanonical TU 3D.
shadow at shadowgard.com
shadow at shadowgard.com
Wed Jan 2 03:36:00 MST 2008
On 1 Jan 2008 at 21:10, Jerry W Barrington wrote:
> On 1/1/08 1:41 AM, "Jerry W Barrington" <jursamaj at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > I have a set of files listing stars within 50, 100, and 1000 LY. The
> > biggest one has (if I recall), over 70,000 stars. But there will be a lot
> > of dimmer stars missing out that far, lots of those M dwarf stars. That's a
> > problem with any star catalog. And it has a lot more than just positional
> > data. Would that help you out?
>
> With reference to the lack of dim stars, I made a graph of the 32000 dimmest
> stars in my list of 77,000 stars mentioned above. Link is below (PNG
> format). The horizontal scale is in Absolute Solar Luminosities. The
> vertical scale is in Squared LY from Sol (the 1,000,000 at top is actual
> 1,000 LY). The 3 dots at the bottom of the chart include Alpha Centauri &
> Proxima Centauri, and something else I haven't identified.
>
> Note the complete lack of stars left of the pink line, and how few are just
> right of it. Stars should be there, but are too dim to be seem at that
> distance by the Hipparcos telescope. This is a major shortcoming of all
> star catalogs. :(
>
> <http://briefcase.yahoo.com/jursamaj>
> Folder: Star Stuff
> File: HipparcosLimits
The folder isn't public.
--
Leonard Erickson (aka shadow)
shadow at shadowgard dot com
More information about the TML
mailing list