[TML] A new tourist ship design
shadow at shadowgard.com
shadow at shadowgard.com
Mon Jan 14 00:36:05 MST 2008
On 14 Jan 2008 at 11:19, Timothy Little wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 12:48:30PM +0100, Knapp wrote:
> > As I understand gravity (not well) I thought that if you had one g
> > it would fade with the square of the distance.
>
> Natural gravity does in such situations, yes. Artificial gravity
> might not.
>
>
> > So this would give the air the same depth as on the Earth.
>
> If it did fade as the inverse square, no. Inverse-square means
> quarter acceleration at twice the distance. For Earth, that "twice
> the distance" is more than 6000 kilometres. For a 500m ball, it's
> quarter the acceleration at 500m, and all the air escapes within
> seconds. The fall-off would have to be a lot slower than inverse
> square.
Which would require some very impressive distributed gravity
generators *in* the air.
> So unlike Earth, heat from the surface will have negligible effect on
> the atmosphere. The ship would have to directly replenish heat in the
> air, somehow, without cooking the surface.
Waste heat from the floating gravity generators that are there to
keep the field from dropping off too fast. :-)
--
Leonard Erickson (aka shadow)
shadow at shadowgard dot com
More information about the TML
mailing list